INVESTMENT POLICY, GEOPOLITICAL RISK AND THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Hasan Tekin

Abstract

In today’s world, given the increasing importance of geopolitical risk (GPR), this study investigates the impact of GPR on corporate investment, or capital expenditure, of nonfinancial firms considering institutional settings. Utilising data on 337,399 firm-years from 42 countries for the period 1996-2021 (retrieved from Datastream), empirical findings show that firms in higher GPR countries present fewer investment opportunities. Namely, firms use capital expenditures as a substitute for GPR. Next, the negative impact of governance on capital expenditures across the whole sample remains for the firms in civil law countries. However, it reverts to positive for those in common law countries. In other words, capital expenditures are a substitute for (outcome of) governance in civil (common) law countries.Overall, investors should be concerned about the level of GPR, governance, and legal system when determining where to invest. Policymakers should consider GPR and institutional quality to attract foreign investors.

Keywords: geopolitical risk, governance, investment, legal system

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Akadiri, Seyi Saint, Kayode Kolawole Eluwole, Ada Chigozie Akadiri, and Turgay Avci. “Does Causality between Geopolitical Risk, Tourism and Economic Growth Matter? Evidence from Turkey.” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 43 (June 1, 2020): 273–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.002.
  2. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk, Ali Yavuz Polat, Hasan Tekin, and Ahmet Semih Tunalı. “The Ascent of Geopolitics: Scientometric Analysis and Ramifications of Geopolitical Risk.” Defence and Peace Economics 34, no. 6 (2023): 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2062981.
  3. Blundell, Richard & Stephen Bond, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, 87, No. 1, pages 115-143, August.
  4. Bradley, Daniel, Christos Pantzalis, and Xiaojing Yuan. “Policy Risk, Corporate Political Strategies, and the Cost of Debt.” Journal of Corporate Finance 40 (October 1, 2016): 254–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.08.001.
  5. Caldara, Dario, and Matteo Iacoviell. “Measuring Geopolitical Risk.” American Economic Review 112, no. 4 (April 1, 2022): 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823.
  6. Cho, Jae Hyun. “The Effect of Geopolitical Risk on Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence from Korea.” Applied Economics Letters, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2176442.
  7. Demir, Ender, José María Díez-Esteban, and Conrado Diego García-Gómez. “The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Cash Holdings of Hospitality Companies: Evidence from Emerging Countries.” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 39 (June 1, 2019): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.004.
  8. Guizani, Moncef, Dorra Talbi, and Gaafar Abdalkrim. “Economic Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Saudi Arabia.” Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 41, no. 2 (March 23, 2023): 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-07-2022-0109.
  9. Istiak, Khandokar, and Apostolos Serletis. “Risk, Uncertainty, and Leverage.” Economic Modelling 91 (September 1, 2020): 257–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.010.
  10. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3, no. 2 (June 4, 2011): 220–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046.
  11. Kotcharin, Suntichai, and Sakkakom Maneenop. “Geopolitical Risk and Corporate Cash Holdings in the Shipping Industry.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 136 (April 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101862.
  12. ———. “Geopolitical Risk and Shipping Firms’ Capital Structure Decisions in Belt and Road Initiative Countries.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 23, no. 6 (November 1, 2020): 544–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1766003.
  13. Le, Anh Tuan, and Thao Phuong Tran. “Does Geopolitical Risk Matter for Corporate Investment? Evidence from Emerging Countries in Asia.” Journal of Multinational Financial Management 62 (December 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2021.100703.
  14. Lee, Chi Chuan, Chien Chiang Lee, and Shunyi Xiao. “Policy-Related Risk and Corporate Financing Behavior: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies.” Economic Modelling 94 (January 1, 2021): 539–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.01.022.
  15. Lee, Chien Chiang, and Chih Wei Wang. “Firms’ Cash Reserve, Financial Constraint, and Geopolitical Risk.” Pacific Basin Finance Journal 65 (February 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101480.
  16. Myers, Stewart C. “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics 5, no. 2 (1977): 147–75.
  17. Polat, Ali Yavuz. “Investor Bias, Risk and Price Volatility.” Journal of Economic Studies 50, no. 7 (October 25, 2023): 1317–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-04-2022-0211.
  18. Tekin, Hasan. “How Optimal Cash Changed by the Global Financial Crisis? A Multi-Country Analysis.” Economics and Business Letters 9, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 114–23. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.9.2.2020.114-123.
  19. ———. “Market Differences and Adjustment Speed of Debt, Equity, and Debt Maturity.” Australian Journal of Management 46, no. 4 (November 1, 2021): 629–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220968266.
  20. Tekin, Hasan, and Huseyin Burgazoglu. “How Do Corporate Sustainability and Pandemic Affect Cash Holdings in Muslim Countries?” Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance 8, no. 4 (2022): 615–36. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i4.1649.
  21. Tekin, Hasan, and Fatih Güçlü. “Environmental, Social, Governance Investing, COVID-19, and Corporate Performance in Muslim Countries.” Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance 9, no. 1 (2023): 107–32. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i1.1592.
  22. Tekin, Hasan, and Ali Yavuz Polat. “Do Market Differences Matter on Dividend Policy?” Borsa Istanbul Review 21, no. 2 (June 1, 2021): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.10.009.
  23. ———. “Is Leverage a Substitute or Outcome for Governance? Evidence from Financial Crises.” International Journal of Emerging Markets 18, no. 4 (March 21, 2023): 1007–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2020-0297.
  24. ———. “Is Saving Vital? Evidence from the Financial Crisis.” Economics and Business Letters 9, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 124–34. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.9.2.2020.124-134.
  25. Tekin, Hasan, Ali Yavuz Polat, Ahmet Faruk Aysan, and Erhan Muğaloğlu. “Cash Management, Governance, and the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from Developing Asia.” Asian Economics Letters 2, no. 4 (August 15, 2021). https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.27135.
  26. Wang, Kai Hua, De Ping Xiong, Nawazish Mirza, Xue Feng Shao, and Xiao Guang Yue. “Does Geopolitical Risk Uncertainty Strengthen or Depress Cash Holdings of Oil Enterprises? Evidence from China.” Pacific Basin Finance Journal 66 (April 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101516.