IMPROVING DIGITAL BANKING THROUGH RISK ASSURANCE: TAM MODIFICATION ANALYSIS

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v3i1.172


Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dwi Marlina Wijayanti
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Hasan Al-Banna
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Achmad Nurdany
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital banks has been followed by changing customer behaviour patterns. On the other hand, customer perceptions of digital banks are that they still carry considerable risk. Therefore, the role of institutions in providing certainty and security guarantees for digital banking customers is very important. Based on this situation, this research explores what factors can encourage individuals to use digital banks, which are currently growing quite rapidly through the role of institutions. The Technological Acceptance Model (TAM) is used as a construct in exploring individual behaviour in reaction to technological innovation in digital banks. In addition, risk guarantees from government institutions are also explored as safeguarding customer security. The sample for this study were 977 digital bank users. Data was collected through a self-administered survey. The results show that perceived service quality (PSQ), service innovation (SI), perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEoU), attitude, and behavioural intentions are factors that encourage actual use of digital banking services. It is also known that perceived risk assurance moderates the relationship between attitude and behavioural intention. This research contributes to policy makers for the expansion of digital bank market share through appropriate marketing strategies for digital banks, as well as strategies to increase deposit insurance literacy.

Keywords: Technological acceptance model (TAM), risk assurance, actual behaviour, digital banking

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Hasan Al-Banna, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Department of Islamic Banking

Achmad Nurdany, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Department of Islamic Economic

References

  1. Abu-taieh, Evon M, Issam Alhadid, Sabah Abu-tayeh, and Rami S Alkhawaldeh. “Continued Intention to Use of M-Banking in Jordan by Integrating UTAUT , TPB , TAM and Service Quality with ML,” 2022.
  2. Albort-Morant, Gema, Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa, and Jazmin R. Paredes Paredes. “Online Banking Adoption in Spanish Cities and Towns. Finding Differences through TAM Application.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 35, no. 1 (2022): 854–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1945477.
  3. Aldammargh, Ziad, Rabah Abdeljawad, and Tareq Obaid. “Predicting Mobile Banking Adoption: An Integration of TAM and TPB with Trust and Perceived Risk.” Financial Internet Quarterly 17, no. 3 (2021): 35–46.
  4. Alhadid, Issam, Evon Abu-taieh, Rami S Alkhawaldeh, and Sufian Khwaldeh. “Predictors for E-Government Adoption of SANAD App . Services Integrating UTAUT , TPB , TAM Trust , and Perceived,” 2022, 1–23.
  5. AL-Nawafleh, Enas Ali, Ghaith Abdulraheem Ali ALSheikh, Abdul Aziz Abdulllah, and Abdul Malek Abdul. “Review of the Impact of Service Quality and Subjective Norms in TAM among Telecommunication Customers in Jordan.” International Journal of Ethics and Systems 35, no. 1 (2019): 148–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2018-0101.
  6. Altin Gumussoy, Cigdem, Aycan Kaya, and Erhan Ozlu. “Determinants of Mobile Banking Use: An Extended TAM with Perceived Risk, Mobility Access, Compatibility, Perceived Self-Efficacy and Subjective Norms,” 2018, 225–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_20.
  7. Anouze, Abdel Latef M., and Ahmed S. Alamro. “Factors Affecting Intention to Use E-Banking in Jordan.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 38, no. 1 (2020): 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2018-0271.
  8. Baj-Rogowska, Anna. “AutoCAD: Examination of Factors Influencing User Adoption.” Engineering Management in Production and Services 12, no. 1 (2020): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0004.
  9. Belloumi, Mounir, and Kamel Touati. “Do FDI Inflows and ICT Affect Economic Growth? An Evidence from Arab Countries.” Sustainability 14, no. 10 (May 21, 2022): 6293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106293.
  10. Bi, Xuehao, Bo Wen, and Wei Zou. “The Role of Internet Development in China’s Grain Production: Specific Path and Dialectical Perspective.” Agriculture 12, no. 3 (March 8, 2022): 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030377.
  11. Bitkina, Olga Vl., Jaehyun Park, and Hyun K. Kim. “Measuring User-Perceived Characteristics for Banking Services: Proposing a Methodology.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 4 (February 18, 2022): 2358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042358.
  12. Chan, Rebecca, Indrit Troshani, Sally Rao Hill, and Arvid Hoffmann. “Towards an Understanding of Consumers’ FinTech Adoption: The Case of Open Banking.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 40, no. 4 (2022): 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397.
  13. Chee, Chew Chu, Rosli Mahmood, and Azizan Mohamed-Isa. “Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Adoption.” Journal of Information Technology Management 13, no. 3 (2021): 116–25. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2021.83117.
  14. Chen, Ming Chih, Shih Shiunn Chen, Hung Ming Yeh, & Wei Guang Tsaur. “The Key Factors Influencing Internet Finances Services Satisfaction: An Empirical Study in Taiwan.” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 6 (2016): 748–62.
  15. Chi, Ting. “Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Understanding Chinese Consumer Adoption of Apparel Mobile Commerce : An Extended TAM Approach.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44, no. April (2018): 274–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.019.
  16. Chuang, Li-Min, Chun-Chu Liu, and Hsiao-Kuang Kao. “The Adoption of Fintech Service: TAM Perspective.” International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences (IJMAS 3, no. 07 (2016): 1–15.
  17. ———. “International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences (IJMAS) The Adoption of Fintech Service: TAM Perspective.” International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences (IJMAS 3, no. 07 (2016): 1–15.
  18. Chuang, Li-min, Chun-chu Liu, and Hsiao-kuang Kao. “The Adoption of Fintech Service : TAM Perspective” 3, no. 07 (2016): 1–15.
  19. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. Business Research Methods, Eleventh Edition. New York: NY: McGraw Hill, 2011.
  20. Davis, F.D. “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information System: Theory and Results.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
  21. ———. “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End User Information System: heory and Results.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
  22. Davis, Fred D. “Perceived Usefulness , Perceived Ease of Use , and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13, no. 3 (1989): 319–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
  23. Davis, Fred D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioural Impacts.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
  24. Dowling, Grahame R., and Richard Staelin. “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity.” Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1 (1994): 119. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386.
  25. Edvardsson, Bo, Pennie Frow, Elina Jaakkola, Timothy Lee Keiningham, Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, Cristina Mele, and Alastair Tombs. “Examining How Context Change Foster Service Innovation.” Journal of Service Management 29, no. 5 (2018): 932–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0112.
  26. Evanschitzky, Heiner, Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer, Kishore Gopalakrishna Pillai, Peter Kenning, and Reinhard Schütte. “Consumer Trial, Continuous Use, and Economic Benefits of a Retail Service Innovation: The Case of the Personal Shopping Assistant.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 32, no. 3 (2015): 459–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12241.
  27. Giovanis, Apostolos, Pinelopi Athanasopoulou, Costas Assimakopoulos, and Christos Sarmaniotis. “Adoption of Mobile Banking Services: A Comparative Analysis of Four Competing Theoretical Models.”
  28. International Journal of Bank Marketing 37, no. 5 (2019): 1165–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2018-0200.
  29. H. Jouda. “Expanding TAM and Investigating the Factors That Effect Consumer Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking in Palestine.” Financial Internet Quarterly 16, no. 03 (2020): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/fiqf-2020-0017.
  30. Hair, Jr. Essential of Business Research Method. USA: Sharpe.Inc, 2011. Hartmann, F., Naranjo-Gil, D., & Perego, P. “The Effect of Leadership Styles and Use of Performance Measures on Managerial Work-Related Attitudes.” European Accounting Review 19, no. 2 (2010): 275–310.
  31. Himel, Md. Tanvir Alam, Shahrin Ashraf, Tauhid Ahmed Bappy, Md Tanaz Abir, Md Khaled Morshed, and Md. Nazmul Hossain. “Users’ Attitude and Intention to Use Mobile Financial Services in Bangladesh: An
  32. Empirical Study.” South Asian Journal of Marketing 2, no. 1 (2021): 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajm-02-2021-0015.
  33. Hu, J. Paul, Patrick Y.K. Chau, Olivia R. Liu Sheng, & Kar Yan Tam. “Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology.” Journal of Management Information Systems 16, no. 2 (1999): 91–112.
  34. Jaw, C, OS Yu, KC Gehrt - International Conference on Economics, and Undefined 2012. “An Expanded Technology Acceptance Framework for E-Service Innovations: The Empirical Study on E-Learning.” Ipedr.Com 38 (2012): 195–200.
  35. Kayral, Ibrahim H. “Perceived Service Quality in Healthcare Organizations and a Research in Ankara by Hospital Type.” Journal of Ankara Studies 2, no. 1 (2014): 22–34.
  36. Kejela, Abera Bekele, and Daniel Porath. “Influence of Attitude on Mobile Banking Acceptance and Factors Determining Attitude of End-Users in Ethiopia.” Journal of Internet and Digital Economics 2, no. 1 (2022): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/jide-08-2021-0007.
  37. Khan, Muhammad Rahies, Faiza Siddiqui, Mubashir Ali Khan, and Yasir Rasool. “Technology Induction in Education During COVID-19 Is Recreation or a Curse ?: Integration of Technological and Behavioural Factors from the Students ‘ Perspective” 11, no. 2 (2021): 267–79.
  38. Marangunić, Nikola, and Andrina Granić. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14, no. 1 (2015): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
  39. Mbama, Cajetan Ikechukwu, Patrick Ezepue, Lyuba Alboul, and Martin Beer. “Digital Banking, Customer Experience and Financial Performance.” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 12, no. 4 (October 8, 2018): 432– 51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2018-0026.
  40. Mishra, Deepti, Ibrahim Akman, and Alok Mishra. “Theory of Reasoned Action Application for Green Information Technology Acceptance.” Computers in Human Behavior 36 (2014): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030.
  41. Nam, Kiheung, Zoonky Lee, and Bong Gyou Lee. “How Internet Has Reshaped the User Experience of Banking Service?” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems 10, no. 2 (2016): 684–702. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2016.02.014.
  42. Namahoot, Kanokkarn Snae, and Tipparat Laohavichien. “Assessing the Intentions to Use Internet Banking: The Role of Perceived Risk and Trust as Mediating Factors.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 36, no. 2 (2018): 256–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2016-0159.
  43. Nwankwo, Cosmas Anayochukwu, Macdonald Isaac Kanyangale, and James Okechukwu Abugu. “The Basics of a Mobile Money-Based Financial Service: Perceptions of University Students in Nigeria.” Foundations of Management 13,no. 1 (2021): 209–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0016.
  44. Oertzen, Anna Sophie, and Gaby Odekerken-Schröder. “Achieving Continued Usage in Online Banking: A Post-Adoption Study.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 37, no. 6 (2019): 1394–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0239.
  45. Polyakova, Olga, and Mohamed Mirza. “Perceived Service Quality Models: Are They Still Relevant?” The Marketing Review 15, no. 1 (2015): 59–82.
  46. Ramjan, Sarawut, and Purimprach Sangkaew. “Understanding the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles in Thailand: An Extended TAM Approach.” Engineering Management in Production and Services 14, no. 1 (2022): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0005.
  47. Rifat, Afrin, Nabila Nisha, and Mehree Iqbal. “Predicting E-Tax Service Adoption: Integrating Perceived Risk, Service Quality and TAM.” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 17, no. 3 (2019): 71–100. https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.2019070105.
  48. Siyal, Abdul Waheed, Ding Donghong, Waheed Ali Umrani, Saeed Siyal, and Shaharbano Bhand. “Predicting Mobile Banking Acceptance and Loyalty in Chinese Bank Customers.” SAGE Open 9, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019844084.
  49. Trivedi, Jay. “Examining the Customer Experience of Using Banking Chatbots and Its Impact on Brand Love: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk.” Journal of Internet Commerce 18, no. 1 (2019): 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.1567188.
  50. Truong, Yann. “A Cross-Country Study of Consumer Innovativeness and Technological Service Innovation.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 20, no. 1 (2013): 130–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.10.014.
  51. Wijayanti, Dwi Marlina, and Fachmi Pachlevi Yandra. “Islamic Fintech: A Solution for Financial Problem.” Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business 9, no. 1 (2021): 065. https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2021.091-05.
  52. Wu, Chih Wen. “The Study of Service Innovation for Digiservice on Loyalty.” Journal of Business Research 67, no. 5 (2014): 819–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.051.
  53. Youssef, Adel ben, Mounir Dahmani, and Ludovic Ragni. “ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide.” Information 13, no. 3 (March 3, 2022): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129.
  54. Z. Aldammagh, R. Abdeljawad, T. Obaid. “Predicting Mobile Banking Adoption: An Integration of TAM and TPB with Trust and Perceived Risk.” Financial Internet Quarterly 17, no. 3 (2021): 35–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/Fiqf-2021-0017.
  55. Zhang, Yan. “Influence Effect of Internet on the Optimization of China’s International Trade Structure Based on Gravity Model.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022 (July 13, 2022): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4771947.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.