BANK INDONESIA’S ROLE IN ERADICATING CORRUPTION: ADOPTING THE WORLD BANK INITIATIVES

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v3i1.32


Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rudi Natamiharja
Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
Febryani Sabatira
Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
Orima Melati Davey
Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
Yuga Narazua Khanza
Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Abstract

Bank Indonesia as the primary agent for maintaining state financial stability plays an essential role in combatting corruption through preventive and repressive measures. However, considering the poor state of corruption management, Indonesia requires a more strategic and measurable framework. In this case, The World Bank Group (WBG) has numerous methods for combatting corruption through structured initiatives. The overall goal of the programs is to achieve a high level of transparency as the central bank’s fundamental premise in dealing with corruption. Thus, by adopting the WBG guidelines and initiatives, Indonesia can gradually scale up its corruption eradication efforts. This study will further highlight three areas, namely: (i) the World Bank alternatives for controlling corruption; (ii) the role of Bank Indonesia in eradicating corruption; and (iii) adoption of the World Bank’s alternatives in strengthening Bank Indonesia’s efforts to eradicate corruption. The study uses normative legal research using a regulatory approach with secondary data collection. The results of the study show that Bank Indonesia has thoroughly adopted the World Bank’s initiatives. Nevertheless, BI still needs to optimise technology-based public transparency, enhance public involvement, and strengthen supervision of sectoral-based corruption risk in the future. 

Keywords: bank indonesia, corruption eradication effort, the world bank initiatives

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Banco Mundial. The World Bank’s Anti-Corruption Guidelines and Sanctions Reform. Washington D.C: The World Bank Group, 2007.
  2. Bank Indonesia. “Governance Commitment”, 2020. https://www.bi.go.id/id/tentang-bi/profil/governance/commitment.aspx.
  3. ———. “Perlindungan Nasabah: Agar Bank & Nasabah Sama-Sama Nyaman”, 2011.
  4. ———. “Whistleblowing System Bank Indonesia”, 2015.
  5. Basyal, Devid Kumar, Niraj Poudyal, and Jin Wan Seo. “Does E-Government Reduce Corruption? Evidence from a Heterogeneous Panel Data Model”. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 12, no. 2 (August 14, 2018): 134–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2017-0073/FULL/XML.
  6. Bissio, Roberto. “Leveraging Corruption: How World Bank Support to Private Sector Undermines Emerging Democracies”. Development 64:1 64, no. 1 (April 19, 2021): 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41301-021-00289-X.
  7. Brusca, Isabel, Francesca Manes Rossi, and Natalia Aversano. “Accountability and Transparency to Fight against Corruption: An International Comparative Analysis.” Global Health Action 20, no. 5 (October 20, 2017): 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393951.
  8. Budiyono, Budiyono. “Peran Bank Indonesia Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perbankan.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. Edsus (2011). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.edsus.268.
  9. Clemens, Michael E, and Michael Kremer. “The New Role of the World Bank.” JEL Codes F35, H87, O19 1, no. 3 (2015).
  10. “Combating Corruption.” The World Bank, 2021.
  11. Dwinanda, Anisa Rahma Dita. “Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Pada Situs Uangteman.Com.” Jurist-Diction 2, no. 3 (July 2019): 819–34. https://doi.org/10.20473/JD.V2I3.14350.
  12. Fadhillah, Ahmad, Zainal Asikin, and Lalu Parman. “Prinsip Mengenal Nasabah (Know Your Customer Principle) Oleh Bank Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” MEDIA BINA ILMIAH 13, no. 10 (November 2019): 1727–38. https://doi.org/10.33758/MBI.V13I10.365.
  13. Gani, Ruslan Abdul. “Eksistensi KPK Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia”. Jurnal Lex Specialis, 2010.
  14. Garoupa, Nuno, and Daniel M. Klerman. “Corruption and Private Law Enforcement: Theory and History”. Review of Law and Economics 6, no. 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1394.
  15. Garoupa, Nuno, and Daniel M Klerman. “University of Southern California Law Corruption and Private Law Enforcement : Theory and History Corruption and Private Law Enforcement : Theory and History.” Law and Economics Working Paper Series, 2009.
  16. “Global Corruption Barometer: Asia 2020 -… - Transparency.Org.” Accessed September 8, 2021. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/gcbasia-2020.
  17. Grasso, Costantino. “Corruption in World Bank–Financed Development Projects : A Phenomenon-Focused Examination”. Corruption in the Global Era, March 5, 2019, 258–76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429197116-13.
  18. Hamilton-Hart, N. “Anti-Corruption Strategies in Indonesia”. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 37, no. 1 (2001): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/000749101300046519.
  19. Hasan, Rashedul, and Muhammad Ashfaq. “Corruption and Its Diverse Effect on Credit Risk: Global Evidence” Future Business Journal 7, no. 1 (2021): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00060-1.
  20. Herliana. “Peran Bank Indonesia Sebagai Pelaksana Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan.” Mimbar Hukum: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 22, no. 1 (2010): 140–56. https://doi.org/10.22146/JMH.16218.
  21. Hindriana, Linda. “Penerapan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Menangani Kejahatan Perbankan.” Aktualita : Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (November 2020): 303–18. https://doi.org/10.29313/AKTUALITA.V0I0.5945.
  22. Hukum, Kebijakan, Pidana Dalam, Penanggulangan Kejahatan, and Henni Muchtar. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Dunia Perbankan =================================================.” Jurnal Demokrasi. Vol. 9, April 1, 2010. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jd/article/view/1412.
  23. “IBRD Articles of Agreement.” World Bank Group, 2018.
  24. International Monetary Fund. “Corruption: Costs and Mitigating Strategies.” Staff Discussion Notes 16, no. 05 (2016): 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513594330.006.
  25. Isgiyata, Jaka, Indayani Indayani, and Eko Budiyoni. “Studi Tentang Teori GONE Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Fraud Dengan Idealisme Pimpinan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi: Studi Pada Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis 5, no. 1 (2018): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v5i1.8253.
  26. Kanbur, Ravi. “The Role of the World Bank in Middle-Income Countries.” Georgetown University Law Center, 2018, 167–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7950-4_8.
  27. Kasasbeh, Hamad A., Metri F. Mdanat, and Raed Khasawneh. “Corruption and FDI Inflows: Evidence from a Small Developing Economy.” Asian Economic and Financial Review 8, no. 8 (2018): 1075–85.
  28. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.88.1075.1085.
  29. Kohler, Jillian Clare, and Andrea Bowra. “Exploring Anti-Corruption, Transparency, and Accountability in the World Health Organisation, the United Nations Development Programme, the World Bank Group, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.” Globalisation and Health 16, no. 1 (2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00629-5.
  30. Lopez, Salvador. “World Bank IDA Grants and Corruption . Why Do Corrupt Countries Still Get Grants ?” Jurnal of Business and Economics: Inquires an Perspective 12, no. 1 (2021).
  31. Mandasari, Zayanti. “Kedudukan Memorandum of Understanding Dan Surat Keputusan Bersama Ditinjau Dari Teori Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 20, no. 2 (April 2013): 278–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL20.ISS2.ART6.
  32. Marcus, Abigail J. “Central Bank Governance and the Prevention and Detection of Corruption.” Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk Answer, 2019. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Central-bank-governance-2019_PR.pdf.
  33. Murphy, Jonathan, and Oana Brindusa Albu. “The Politics of Transnational Accountability Policies and the (Re)Construction of Corruption: The Case of Tunisia, Transparency International and the World Bank.” Accounting Forum 42, no. 1 (2018): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.10.005.
  34. Nguyen, Xuan Minh, and Quoc Trung Tran. “Corruption and Corporate Investment Efficiency around the World,” n.d. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-11-2020-0321.
  35. Njatrijani, Rinitami, Bagus Rahmanda, and Reyhan Dewangga Saputra.“Hubungan Hukum Dan Penerapan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Dalam Perusahaan.” Gema Keadilan 6, no. 3 (November 2019): 242–67. https://doi.org/10.14710/GK.6.3.242-267.
  36. Sabani, Alvedi, Mohamed H. Farah, and Dian Retno Sari Dewi. “Indonesia in the Spotlight: Combating Corruption through ICT Enabled Governance.” Procedia Computer Science 161 (2019): 324–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.130.
  37. Shihata, Ibrahim F.I., and James D. Wolfensohn. “Corruption — A General Review with an Emphasis on the Role of the World Bank.” In The World Bank in a Changing World, 603–40. Brill | Nijhoff, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004480377_023.
  38. Susan Rose-Ackerman. “The Role of the World Bank in Controlling Corruption.” Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 29 (1997): 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7950-4_8.
  39. Susilo, Anggun Trisnanto Hari. The Indonesian National Program for Community Empowerment (Pnpm) Rural: Decentralization in the Context of Neoliberalism and World Bank Policies. International Institute of Social Studies. Netherlands: Forest Stewardship Council, 2021.
  40. Suwandi, Imam, Ria Arifianti, and Muhamad Rizal. “Pelaksanaan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) PADA PT. Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (JASINDO).” Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik 2, no. 1 (July 2018): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.24198/JMPP.V2I1.21559.
  41. Tektona, Rahmadi Indra, and Qoriatur Risma. “Penerapan Prinsip Character Dalam Pelaksanaan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pada Analisis Pemberian Kredit Usaha Mikro.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (October 2020): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.420.
  42. The World Bank. “Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank,” 1997.
  43. ———. “What We Do,” 2013.
  44. The World Bank Group. Anticorruption Initiatives: Reaffirming Commitment to a Development Priority. World Bank Group Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions. Vol. 125. Washington D.C: The World Bank Group, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13249.
  45. “Transparency International Indonesia – the Global Coalition Against Corruption.” Accessed June 30, 2022. https://ti.or.id/.
  46. UN Security Council. “Global Cost of Corruption at Least 5 Per Cent of World Gross Domestic Product, Secretary-General Tells Security Council, Citing World Economic Forum Data | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases.” Accessed June 23, 2022. https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/sc13493.doc.htm.
  47. Unit, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management. Combating Corruption in Indonesia: Enhancing Accountability for Development Combating. World Bank. East Asia and Pacific Region, 2003.
  48. Vian, Taryn. “Anti-Corruption, Transparency and Accountability in Health: Concepts, Frameworks, and Approaches.” Global Health Action, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694744.
  49. Wamafma, Filep, Enni Martha Sasea, and Andi Marlina. “Upaya Bank Indonesia Menanggulangi Money Laundering Dalam Perbankan Online.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 357–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2015.10.
  50. Wanless, Megan. “The World Bank’s Fight against Corruption: ‘See Nothing, Hear Nothing, Say Nothing.’” Hydra 1, no. 2 (2013).
  51. Wulandari, Laely, and Lalu Parman. “The Role of Legal Culture in Corruption Eradication Effort (A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Japanese Corruption Crime Handling).” Unram Law Review 3, no. 1 (2019): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v3i1.65.
  52. Yorisca, Yenny. “Tantangan Global Saat Ini: Menghadapi Peer to Peer Lending Dengan Know Your Customer Principles Dalam Praktik Perbankan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 2 (June 2021): 272–81. https://doi.org/10.54629/JLI.V18I2.751.
  53. Indonesia, Law No. 24 (PRP) of 1960 on the Crime of Corruption.
  54. Indonesia, Law No. 3 of 1971 on Corruption Eradication
  55. Indonesia, Law No. 28 of 1999 on State Administrators that are Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism
  56. Indonesia, Law No. 20 of 2001 on Amendments to Law no. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes
  57. Indonesia, Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission.
  58. Indonesia, Law Number 10 of 1998 on Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 on Banking
  59. Indonesia, Law No. 3 of 2004 and Law No. 7 of 1992 amended by Law No. 10 of 1998 on banks which outline the right of central banks to regulate, supervise, and impose sanctions.
  60. Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 3/10/PBI/2001 on the Implementation of Know Your Customer Principles.
  61. Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 11/28/PBI/2009 on the Implementation of Anti-Money Laundering and Prevention of Terrorism Financing Programs for Commercial Banks, which was updated with Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 14/27/PBI/2012
  62. Joint Decree No. KEP.902/A/J.A.12/2004, No. POL.: Skep/924/XII/2004, No. 6/91/Kep.GBI/2004 on Cooperation in dealing with illegal acts in the banking sector
  63. Memorandum of Understanding between the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia, Chief of the Indonesian National Police, and the Governor of Bank Indonesia No: 13/104/KEP.GBI/2011, No: B/31/XII/2011, No: Kep-26/A/JA/12/2011 on Optimising the Eradication of Corruption
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.