THE POSITION OF BRIDGE BANKS AS INSTRUMENTS FOR RESOLVING BANK FAILURES IN INDONESIA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 25, 2023
https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v2i2.162


Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Zulfikar Hasan
STAIN Bengkalis
Kamiluddin
University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

Abstract

We analysed the capacity for banks to fail in Indonesia. A “failed bank” can be decoded as a bank facing financial difficulties and possibility of collapse. It is no longer feasible for the LPP (Banking Supervisory Agency) to address bank failures under its current authority. In Indonesia, bank failures are managed by the Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC), helped by rules from Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Under Article 5 of Law no. 24 of 2004 regarding the Deposit Insurance Corporation, one of the jobs of IDIC is to develop, specify and enforce a procedure for the liquidation of failing banks that do not have a systemic effect and address failing banks that do have a systemic effect. The definition of systemic effect is when a bank’s failure will have an extraordinary impact on the availability of funds and the smoothness and sustainability of the economy. While a non-systemic effect is bank’s failure that does not meet the standards noted above. The implication of our research is to provide an understanding that assistance for failing banks in Indonesia is taken over by the IDIC which will form an entity called a bridge bank.

Keywords: bank failure, banking, bridge, deposit insurance corporation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Ariffandi, Afnizal Zulfan, and Irwan Trinugroho. “The Effect of Fintech Loans on Commercial Bank Margin.” Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan 26, no. 4 (2022): 756–65. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v26i4.7865DOI.
  2. Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun, R. Suharto, and Marjo Siti Mahmudah. “Ketidakpastian Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan Sebagai Penanggung Dalam Perjanjian Antara Nasabah Dan Bank.” Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 77–96.
  3. Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 18/POJK.03/2020 Tentang Perintah Tertulis Untuk Penanganan Permasalahan Bank., 2020.
  4. Dewi, Sri Anggraini Kusuma. “Peran Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) Pada Bank Gagal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah.” Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 10, no. 26 (2019): 101–20.
  5. Eka, Rizky, Suci Ramadhani, and Dosen Fakultas. “Independensi Bank Indonesia Dalam Penanganan Permasalahan Bank Sistemik Setelah Adanya Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2016.” Simposium Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2016): 1–14.
  6. F., M. Ajib Bahrul. “Penanganan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Yang Dinyatakan Gagal.” Jurist-Diction 3, no. 2 (2020): 401–24. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i2.18195.
  7. Field, Alexander J. “The Savings and Loan Insolvencies and the Costs of Financial Crisis.” Research in Economic History 33 (2017): 65–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0363-326820170000033003.
  8. Hasan, Zulfikar. “The Impact of Covid-19 On Islamic Banking in Indonesia During the Pandemic Era.” Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business 8, no. 2 (2020): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17687/jeb.0802.03.
  9. Hasan, Zulfikar, Nur Azlina, and Muhammad Al Mansur, Syaifullah. “Implementation of Whistleblowing System to Prevent Sharia Banking Crime in Indonesia.” AZKA International Journal of Zakat & Social Finance (AZJAF) 3, no. 1 (2022): 32–52, https://doi.org/10.51377/azjaf.vol3no1.93
  10. Hasan, Zulfikar, Mutia Rosiana, and Nita Putri. “Islamic Banking in Indonesia and Globalization in Era 4 . 0.” Management Research Journal 10, no. 2 (2021): 103–11.
  11. Hutagalung, Muhammad Wandisyah R, and Muhammad Isa. “The Impact of Covid-19 on Digital Sharia Banking in Padangsidimpuan City.” Islamic Banking: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah 8 (2022): 55–80.
  12. Indonesia, Bank. “Penetapan Status Dan Tindak Lanjut Pengawasan Bank Umum Konvensional,” 2013.
  13. ———. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/ 3 /PBI/2011 Tentang Penetapan Status Dan Tindak Lanjut Pengawasan Bank, 2011.
  14. ———. Peraturan Pemertntah Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan Dalam Rangka Melaksanakan Langkah-Langkah Penanganan Permasalahan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan, 2019.
  15. ———. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Krisis Sistem Keuangan,” 2016.
  16. Ismal, Rifki. “Volatility of the Returns and Expected Losses of Islamic Bank Financing.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 3, no. 3 (2010): 267–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011072453.
  17. Nanang, and Sri Anggraini Kusuma Dewi. “Peran Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) Pada Bank Gagal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah.” Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (2019).
  18. Palupi. “Penanganan Dan Penyelesaian Bank Gagal Oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS),” 2011.
  19. Penjamin, Lembaga, and Simpanan. “Peraturan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Penanganan Bank Sistemik Yang Mengalami Permasalahan Solvabilitas,” 2017.
  20. Pradana, Nanang, and Sri Anggraini Kusuma Dewi, “Peran Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) Pada Bank Gagal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah,” Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (2019): 101-120, http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v10i2.6065
  21. Setiawan, Sigit. “Analisis Kebijakan Pendanaan Penjaminan Simpanan Indonesia.” Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuanghan 13, no. 1 (2009): 51–65, https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v13i1.89.
  22. Simatupang, H Bachtiar, Universitas Islam, and Sumatera Utara. “Peranan Perbankan Dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Indonesia.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma (JRAM) 6, no. 2 (2019): 136–46.
  23. Simpanan, Lembaga Penjamin. “Mekanisme Resolusi Bank.” Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan, 2004.
  24. Sitepu, Rasidin Karo Karo. “Model Makro-Ekonometrika Postur Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) Indonesia.” Kajian Ekonomi Keuangan 5, no. 3 (2021): 190-216, https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v5i3.959.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.