THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF THE ASSET QUALITY REVIEW IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v3i3.281


Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vesna Lukovic
Independent Researcher

Abstract

During the financial crisis that started in 2008, banks in the European Union (EU) needed state aid to stay afloat. After years of bailing out failing banks with public money, which led to high public debt levels across the EU, the European Commission introduced the bail-in approach. This approach required stress tests and asset quality reviews (AQR) to identify capital shortfalls in the various banking systems. The idea was to review the quality of banks’ assets, including the collateral valuations and the adequacy of assets and other collateral provisions. This study focuses on the case of Slovenia, the first EU member state that applied a bail-in approach even before it became a legally binding law at the EU level. The Slovenian bail-in led to the cancellation of all subordinated obligations (shares or bonds) held by thousands of investors, mainly private individuals. The information asymmetry and data confidentiality argument together with the applied assumptions in AQR and stress tests have raised questions about the reliability and credibility of the national and EU authorities in this respect. This paper focuses on the social/human dimension of this case by presenting the current situation through the lens of the temporal dimension of former investors’ plight in their legal attempts to challenge those extraordinary measures. The paper revolves around data confidentiality and other issues that have contributed to the fact that this situation remains unresolved, more than ten years after the nationalisation measures. The finding of this analysis is that former investors have had no legal means to effectively challenge nationalisation measures because the authorities in Slovenia have failed to provide an appropriate tool that would be effective and available in practice.

Keywords: bail-in, AQR, subordinated debt, lack of judicial remedies, nationalisation measures

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Bank for International Settlements, “Supervisory and Bank Stress Testing: A Range of Practices,”
  2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (December 2017): 1-66. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d427.pdf
  3. --------- Fernando Restoy Chairman, Financial Stability Institute, “The European banking union: what are the missing pieces?” Public lecture at the International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva, Switzerland, October 2018.
  4. Bank of Slovenia, Report on the comprehensive review of the banking system, 23.11. 2013.
  5. https://bankaslovenije.blob.core.windows.net/uploaded/Financial%20Stability%2FSTRES%20TESTS%2FKratko_poročilo_FINeng_FULL.pdf.
  6. Bibow Jörg, “Lost at Sea: The Euro Needs a Euro Treasury,” Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper no. 780. (November 2013):1-64. https: levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_780.pdf.
  7. Blatter K. Joachim, Haverland Markus, and Mrlijn Van Hulst, “Qualitative Research in Political Science,” Volume 1-4. Sage Library of Political Science. 2019. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-in-political science/book245301.
  8. Bogart W.A., “Consequences: The Impact of Law and its Complexity,” 2002. University of Toronto Press.
  9. Cornelissen, Joep P., “Preserving Theoretical Divergence in Management Research: Why the Explanatory Potential of Qualitative Research Should Be Harnessed Rather than Suppressed,” Journal of Management Studies (2017). 54:3.
  10. Damjan, Matija, Klemen Podobnik, Ana Vlahek, “Izbris kvalificiranih obveznosti bank. Pravna analiza primera Kotnik”. Ljubljana: Institut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti . (2019): 1-402. https://www.ipp-pf.si/uploads/File/Izbris%20kvalificiranih%20obveznosti%20bank%20-%20knjiga.pdf.
  11. Dnevnik, “Kup skrivnosti okoli slabih terjatev NLB ostaja,” By Katja Svensek. 11. November 2016. https:// www.dnevnik.si/1042754398.
  12. Durré, Alain, “The future of the euro as a suboptimal currency area,” Reflets et perspectives de la vie economique (2017/4):31 – 45. www.cairn-int.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=E_RPVE_564_0031. ECB.“The response of the Eurosystem to the financial crisis, Speech by José Manuel González-Páramo, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB Keynote Speech at the European Parliament’s Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (CRIS),” Brussels, 10 November 2009.
  13. --------- Speech by Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank at the Global Investment Conference in London on 26 July 2012. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html.
  14. ---------- “The role of stress testing in supervision and macroprudential policy,” Keynote address by Vítor Constâncio, Vice-President of the ECB, at the London School of Economics Conference on “Stress Testing and Macroprudential Regulation: A Trans-Atlantic Assessment,” London, October 2015.
  15. ---------- “Government debt reduction strategies in the Eurozone,” Economic Bulletin No.3, Article 2 (2016):1-20. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/eb201603_article02.en.pdf.
  16. --------- Letter from Mario Draghi, Frankfurt, 6 July 2016, L/MD/16/345. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/160706letter_fiser.en.pdf.
  17. --------- “STAMP€: Stress-Test Analytics for Macro-Prudential Purposes in the Eurozone,” (February 2017): 1-218. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/conferences/shared/pdf/20170511_2nd_mp_policy/DeesHenryMartin-Stampe-Stress-Test_Analytics_for_Macroprudential_Purposes_in_the_euro_area.en.pdf.
  18. Epstein, Richard A., “Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property,”Washington University Law Quarterly (1986), 64:3.
  19. European Commission Press Release, “State Aid: Commission Approves Slovenian Support for Credit Institutions,” 12 December 2008. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_08_1964.
  20. ---------- Report from the Commission on the Alert Mechanism Report 2013 prepared in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of the Regulation on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances (COM (2012)751 FINAL, (28. 11. 2012): 1-26. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/6cf1f9e6-093f-4b6e-a45b-0551fbbae1d6_en?filename=2013-european-semester-alert-mechanism-report-en.pdf&prefLang=hr.
  21. --------- Press Release, “State Aid: Commission adapts crisis rules,” 10 July 2013 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_13_672.
  22. --------- Press release, “State aid: Commission approves rescue or restructuring aid for five Slovenian banks,” 18 December 2013 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_13_1276.
  23. -------- Memo, “A comprehensive EU response to the financial crisis: substantial progress towards a strong financial framework for Europe and a banking union for the Eurozone,” 24 January 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_14_57.
  24. European Court of Auditors, “Control of State Aid To Financial Institutions In The EU: In Need Of A Fitness Check,” https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/state-aid-banks-21-2020/en/#:~:text=During%20the%20financial%20crisis%2C%20the,kept%20to%20the%20minimum%20necessary. Special Report (21/2020):1-31.
  25. European Court of Human Rights Judgement, Pintar and others v Slovenia (Applications nos. 49969/14 and 4 others – see appended list). 14 September 2021 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-211787.
  26. European Parliament, “Better regulation and the improvement of EU regulatory environment. Institutional and Legal Implications of the Use of ‘Soft Law’ Instruments,” (March 2007):1-18, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2007/378290/IPOL-JURI_NT(2007)378290_EN.pdf.
  27. Hibson D. Heather, Theodore Palivos, and George S. Tavlas, “The crisis in the Eurozone: an analytic overview,” Special Conference paper no.28. Bank of Greece. July 2013. https://www.bankofgreece.gr/Publications/ SCP201328.pdf.
  28. Lane, Philip R., “The European Sovereign Debt Crisis,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 26, no.3 (Summer 2012): 49-68. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.26.3.49
  29. Lovec, Marko, “Politics of setting an example: The European Banking Union and the case of Slovenia,” L'Europe en Formation. 2017 Vol 2-3 (n° 383-384): 84-98, https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-europe-en-formation-2017-2-page-84.htm.
  30. McKee, Martin, Marina Karanikolos, and Paul Belcher, “Austerity: a failed experiment on the people of Europe,” Clin Med (London), Vol.12, no.4 (August 2012):346-50. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.
  31. Podvršič, Ana and Dora Piroska, “New European Banking Governance and Crisis of Democracy: Bank Restructuring and Privatization in Slovenia,” New Political Economy, Vol. 25, no. 6 (2019): 992-1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.
  32. Republika Slovenija, Informacijski pooblascenec, “Sodba upravnega sodisca,” Stevilka: 090-243/2016 z dne 07.12.2016. https://www.ip-rs.si/informacije-javnega-značaja/iskalnik-po-odločbah/605091cb1da74.
  33. --------- Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve, Preiskovalci NPU za dokazi zlorabe v. Bancnem sektorju. 6.7.2016, https://www.policija.si/index.php/component/content/article/35-sporocila-za-javnost/84883-preiskovalci-npu-za-dokazi-zlorabe-v-bannem-sektorju-sporoilo-za-javnost.
  34. --------- Racunsko sodisce, Revizijsko porocilo, St. 3265-1/2019/176. 9 December 2020. Izvajanjenadzorstvenih funkcij Banke Slovenije. https://www.rs-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/Datoteke/Revizije/2020/BankaSlovenije_smotrnost/BS_rev_por_web.pdf.
  35. --------- Ustavno sodisce, Sklep U-I-295/13/132, 6.11.2014. https://www.us-rs.si/media/u-i-295-13-132.pdf.
  36. --------- Ustavno sodisce, Odlocba U-I-295-13-260, 19.10.2016 https://www.us-rs.si/media/u-i-295-13.odlocba.pdf.
  37. --------- Ustavno sodisce, Odlocba U-I-4/20-66.16.2.2023, https://www.us-rs.si/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/U-I-4-20_Odlocba.pdf.
  38. --------- Gov.si, “Vlada sprejela predlog zakona o sodnem varstvu nekdanjih imetnikov kvalificiranih obveznosti bank,” 22.2.2024 https://www.gov.si/novice/2024-02-22-vlada-sprejela-predlog-zakona-o-sodnem-varstvu-nekdanjih-imetnikov-kvalificiranih-obveznosti-bank/.
  39. Reuters, “Slovenia cbank defends 2013 bank overhaul, says police raid took unrelated Documents,” By Marja Novak and Balazs Koranyi. 7 July 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/slovenia-cenbank-idUKL8N19U1VF.
  40. Sourdin, Tania and Naomi Burstyner, “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied,” Victoria University Law and Justice Journal (2014), 4(1): 49–62.
  41. Yin K. Robert. “Qualitative Research from Start to Finish” 2016 The Gilford Press. New York, NY.
  42. Vlahek Ana and Damjan Matija. “European Commission’s Banking Communication: Question of Validity in the Slovenian Banking Bail-in Puzzle”. European State Aid Law Quarterly. Vol. 15, no. 3 (2016): 458-467. https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2016/3/14.
  43. VMZD. Pan Slovenian Stakeholders’ Association. 11.11.2016. https://www.vzmd.si/novice/se-revizija-racunskega-sodisca-potrdila-da-je-sanacija-bank-2013-oskodovala-vlagatelje-ter-vse-drzavljane-apel-vzmd-ki-na-to-opozarja-ze-tretje-leto-kdaj-se-bodo-najvisji-odlocevalci-prebudili-iz-triletnega-spanca.
  44. Webley Lisa. “Stumbling Blocks in Empirical Legal Research: Case Study Research” Law and Methods. (2016). Westminster Research. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/d7fc6d5c9c7234f627b94b7206daf7448a2a9c35c2ebfb32a18f9b49681647c1/205286/Stumbling_Blocks_in_Empirical_Legal_Research_Case_Study_Research.pdf.
  45. Zbor, Drzavni, Sejni zapisi Drzavnega zbora, 39. Izredna seja. 21 June 2013. https://fotogalerija.dz-rs.si/datoteke/Publikacije/Sejni_zapisi_Drzavnega_zbora/2011-2014/2013-06-21_IS_39.pdf.
  46. CJEU, Judgement in case C-526/14. 19 July 2019, Reference for a preliminary ruling, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0526&from=EN.
  47. -------- Judgement in case C-316/19 - Commission v. Slovenia. 17 December 2020, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=235706&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4302107.
  48. -------- Judgement in case C-45/21, 13 September 2022, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0045.
  49. European Union, Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union C 326/47 from 26.0.2012.
  50. European Commission, Communication to the European Council on 4 March 2009, COM (2009) 114 final.
  51. European Commission, “Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis,” Official Journal of the European Union C 216/1 from 30.7.2013.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.